Elizabeth Bennet embarks for the United States to visit her Aunt and Uncle Gardiner, who are temporarily living there for business reasons. Fitzwilliam Darcy is traveling on the same ship (his own), off to collect Georgiana, who traveled to New York with Mrs. Annesley to attend the birth of the latter's first grandchild. Though there are no balls and dinner parties, the early interactions between Elizabeth and Darcy mirror the events of Pride and Prejudice. For example, this rather familiar conversation:
"Do not worry yourself, Captain. I have only seen meagrely tolerable women on this ship; certainly none handsome enough to tempt me in the least."Of course, his very prejudiced opinion was overheard. At the Meryton Assembly or on the deck of a ship, Elizabeth and Darcy get off on the wrong foot. Though the unusual intimacy afforded by weeks at sea (including a horrifying but fascinating storm) allow them to recognize their feelings for each other much sooner than they do in Pride and Prejudice, once they leave the ship our hero and heroine are in very much the same place that Austen leaves them at the Hunsford parsonage: divided by misunderstanding. In the process of bringing them back together, Ms. Louise turns the events of Pride and Prejudice completely on their head, allowing all the familiar episodes to unfold in reverse order. The result is a remarkable treat for Austen fans, allowing us to relive our favorite moments from a thoroughly fresh perspective.
The captain laughed. "Darcy, you have not changed one bit in the years I have known you. You and your impeccable, fastidious nature. I have seen several whom I would regard as quite pretty."
"I have no intention on this voyage to give consequence to ladies who have been unable to secure a husband for themselves in England and who are determined to find one aboard this sailing vessel even before arriving in America. it is apparent to me that the ladies on this ship, for the most part, have little beauty and no breeding at all. Most are decidedly beneath my station."
I did, as feared each time I chose not read Pemberley's Promise, find that the premise required a bit of a mental leap. No matter how much I enjoyed everything else about the story, I still can't quite wrap my mind around the notion of Elizabeth traveling steerage and alone. Her place there is absolutely essential for the plot to function, but the unlikelihood of her family agreeing to her traveling in such a matter, especially for no more urgent reason than a vacation, continues to irritate me. Upon return to England, the interpretation that unfriendly parties (namely Caroline Bingley) place upon such unusual travel arrangements helped to assuage my chagrin, but still I wish there was a way of setting up the story without subjecting Elizabeth to such precarious conditions.
The beauty of Austen variations and "What if?" JAFF is how twists in events elucidate the emotions of characters we love, like in this scene at Netherfield:
"Why...I would have to object, Miss Bingley!" Elizabeth protested.I love how Elizabeth's insecurities remain precisely what they were in the original story, only intensified by her greater emotional involvement in Darcy. It's moments like this that lead me to assert that fan fiction, at its best, is one of the most relevant and direct forms of literary criticism. All of Ms. Louise's novels excel in this area, and I do hope that Darcy's Voyage will be followed by more of her other novels being released by Sourcebooks. My very favorite is Master Under Good Regulation, the story of Pride and Prejudice told from the perspective of Mr. Darcy's dog.
Darcy looked to Elizabeth, recognizing the look of anger and insult written across her face, coupled with a very determined look of wishing to speak her mind. She continued, "We may not have all the advantagesone has in town, but we certainly have opportunities that we may take advantage of to improve ourselves."
"Perhaps it would not be the norm," Darcy interjected, "but I do believe one could easily find an unblemished pearl - or two - in a country neighborhood such as this, if one knew where to look and what exactly he was looking for."
Elizabeth's anger was somewhat appeased by Darcy's words. He had, at least, stood up for her, and for that she was grateful. If he had remained silent, she could only suppose he agreed with Miss Bingley, and she did not think she could bear that.
Alexa,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the novel as well, but had the same problems as you with Elizabeth traveling unchaperoned in steerage. I recently hosted Kara Louise with an interview on my blog and was able to ask her about this. She gave some great answers! http://lauragerold.blogspot.com/2010/09/kara-louise-author-of-darcys-voyage.html
Master Under Good Regulation sounds fantastic - I'll have to check it out!
Hi Laura! I will definitely go check out your interview. Thanks for letting me know about it. Usually, I would have found it on my own, but I am super behind on keeping up with the blogs I follow recently. Master Under Good Regulation is really wonderful, especially for dog lovers. Hope you enjoy it!
ReplyDeleteI am so glad you enjoyed this one! I think it is such a beautiful and unique variation! I love the parts with Caroline Bingley interferring with Darcy and Elizabeth! She is a mess, isn't she?
ReplyDeleteI really like the sound of MUGR, I hope that one gets picked up by Sourcebooks too!
Hi Alexa! Thanks for a great review! I did want to make one minor correction, however. This was previously published as Pemberley's Promise, not Pemberley by the Sea (which is Abigail Reynold's great book). Now it's funny, as our 2 books that are being released within a month of each other have the same girl's portrait on the cover, and then in the spring our two books have very similar titles: What Would Mr. Darcy Do? and Only Mr. Darcy Will Do. So I guess if my books are going to be confused with someone else's, it's probably always going to be Abigail (and I can't complain). thanks again!
ReplyDeleteHi Meredith! I hope you read Master Under Good Regulation, as I'd love to compare thoughts on it with you. Let me know if/when you pick it up and I will reread for the occasion.
ReplyDeleteHi Kara! I can't believe I mixed the books up, having just reviewed The Man Who Loved Pride and Prejudice last month. All the titles do start to blend a bit after a while. I have fixed the titles and apologize for my carelessness - I have no better excuse. The book was magnificent. Will Sourcebooks be releasing more of your novels?
Sorry I'm so long in getting back to you! Other than Only Mr. Darcy Will Do, there is nothing concrete. I imagine they are going to see how this one does. They had originally wanted to publish Assumed Engagement and Pemberley's Promise, and I talked them into Something Like Regret because I had just finished it. So if they publish another one, I assume it would be AE. I, too, would love MUGR to be published. That one has a special place in my heart - especially now that I finally got my very own Reggie (an English Springer Spaniel)!
ReplyDeleteHi Kara. You have a real Reggie? That's fabulous! I really need to reread that book as it is one of my absolute favorites. I hope Sourcebooks follows through and publishes several more of your books. They are amongst the very best. Best of luck to you. You always have a firm fan in me.
ReplyDelete