The gentleness, modesty, and sweetness of her character were warmly expatiated on; that sweetness which makes so essential a part of every woman's worth in the judgment of man, that though he sometimes loves where it is not, he can never believe it absent. Her temper he had good reason to depend on and to praise. He had often seen it tried. Was there one of the family, excepting Edmund, who had not in some way or other continually exercised her patience and forbearance? Her affections were evidently strong. To see her with her brother! What could more delightfully prove that the warmth of her heart was equal to its gentleness? What could be more encouraging to a man who had her love in view? Then, her understanding was beyond every suspicion, quick and clear; and her manners were the mirror of her own modest and elegant mind. Nor was this all. Henry Crawford had too much sense not to feel the worth of good principles in a wife, though he was too little accustomed to serious reflection to know them by their proper name; but when he talked of her having such a steadiness and regularity of conduct, such a high notion of honour, and such an observance of decorum as might warrant any man in the fullest dependence on her faith and integrity, he expressed what was inspired by the knowledge of her being well principled and religious.
Name: Fanny Price
Age: 18
Hobbies: Reading, riding, and occasional stargazing.
Most charming quality: The gentleness of her nature.
Most detrimental tendency: The gentleness of her nature.
Greatest strength: Impeccable morality.
Truest friend: William Price
Worst Enemy: Aunt Norris
Prospects: Rather vague. As Sir Thomas Bertram's niece and ward, she must have some security, but all he ever says on the subject is as follows: "... we must secure to the child, or consider ourselves engaged to secure to her hereafter, as circumstances may arise, the provision of a gentlewoman, if no such establishment should offer as you are so sanguine in expecting."
Favorite quotations: "Cut down an avenue! What a pity! Does it not make you think of Cowper? 'Ye fallen avenues, once more I mourn your fate unmerited.' "
"Perhaps, sir," said Fanny, wearied at last into speaking--"perhaps, sir, I thought it was a pity you did not always know yourself as well as you seemed to do at that moment."
"How wonderful, how very wonderful the operations of time, and the changes of the human mind!" And following the latter train of thought, she soon afterwards added: "If any one faculty of our nature may be called more wonderful than the rest, I do think it is memory. There seems something more speakingly incomprehensible in the powers, the failures, the inequalities of memory, than in any other of our intelligences. The memory is sometimes so retentive, so serviceable, so obedient; at others, so bewildered and so weak; and at others again, so tyrannic, so beyond control! We are, to be sure, a miracle every way; but our powers of recollecting and of forgetting do seem peculiarly past finding out."
"I had not, Miss Crawford, been an inattentive observer of what was passing between him and some part of this family in the summer and autumn. I was quiet, but I was not blind."
"Here's harmony!" said she; "here's repose! Here's what may leave all painting and all music behind, and what poetry only can attempt to describe! Here's what may tranquillise every care, and lift the heart to rapture! When I look out on such a night as this, I feel as if there could be neither wickedness nor sorrow in the world; and there certainly would be less of both if the sublimity of Nature were more attended to, and people were carried more out of themselves by contemplating such a scene."
"We have all a better guide in ourselves, if we would attend to it, than any other person can be."
Musings: I completely fail to understand why so many readers are intolerant of poor Fanny. Certainly, she is rather unlike the "sparkling" heroines of Austen's more popular novels, but I feel the hatred people harbor towards her is totally unfounded, possibly irrational. We admire Elizabeth Bennet for her willingness to reject both Mr. Collins and, far more so, Mr. Darcy, but when Fanny behaves similarly, readers scream with rage. For though Fanny is a meek and timid creature, is it not an act of incredible courage (quite frankly, more than I feel Elizabeth displays) to reject Henry Crawford, especially when her entire family is aligned against her decision? And why would anyone want her to marry Mr. Crawford, who thoroughly proves himself a cad and a scoundrel? Do we truly believe that Fanny would reform him? Isn't such a scenario as unlikely as Marianne being able to find happiness with Willoughby? Why do so many want this poor girl, who has already suffered so much due to the mercenary values of society, to sacrifice herself for worldly gain?
I am going to be quite harsh here, because I think it warranted: when lovers of Austen censure Fanny Price, they are acting exactly like Mrs. Norris. That's right. Your eyes do not deceive you. Cruel, misguided Aunt Norris. If you wish to overcome such harsh criticism, then please, dear Janeites, try to muster a little sympathy for Fanny. If you were a shy, affectionate little girl, taken from your home, treated as a second class citizen, and deprived of the solicitude that everyone craves, would you not grow up to be humble and diffident? And in such a state, when confronted with a situation that offends your basic morality, while all those around you urge you to act in a manner that you know to be wrong, would you have the courage to resist? I admire Fanny Price, as did Austen, who refers to her as "My Fanny", a possessive and affectionate appellation that she never attaches to any of her other heroines. Sequels and reimaginings might alter Fanny to suit the author's whim, while films portray her as something totally unrecognizable from the book, but I think she is delightful just as she is, and what Austen approved is more than good enough for me.
Images:
http://austenprose.com/2008/08/31/mansfield-park-revelation-i-am-fanny-price-are-you/
http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Faculty/sparrill/
http://bookrat-misty.blogspot.com/2010/06/friday-face-off-austen-heroines-on.html
I totally agree with you. I think Fanny is an admirable character. While shy and gentle she has a will of iron. She always follows her principles and does her best to be of use and bring comfort to those around her. I absolutely admire her for her strength and her many wonderful qualities. In fact, after rereading "Mansfield Park" I realized that it just might be my favourite Austen novel. But then, they are all so brilliant and different that it is hard to tell:)) I hate that so many readers call Fanny names just because she is sweet and modest and does what her heart and principles dictate her.
ReplyDeleteHi Farida, and welcome! Mansfield Park is one of my favorite Austen novels too (and yes, it is a "partial and prejudice" exercise to attempt to rank them, as all are magnificent). I fail to understand why such hatred exists towards Fanny. I think she is perfectly lovely, and I wish I was more like her. Thanks for stopping by!
ReplyDeleteI've always liked the character of Fanny and I think it part of Austen's genius that she created such a heroine; It's something one didn't expect.
ReplyDeleteI love Fanny. I think, as Ashton-Dennis (sadly RIP, of the Male Voices in Praise of Jane Austen site, now happily archived) said, people feel judged by Jane Austen through Fanny. But I don't - I feel challenged to become better.
ReplyDeleteHi Katherine and ibmiller! Thanks for the comments! You both make excellent points, with which I completely agree. It's interesting that all the comments on this post, so far, are from Fanny lovers. Perhaps the haters are ashamed of themselves? That seems too optimistic to be true.
ReplyDelete“Nothing is more deceitful," said Darcy, "than the appearance of humility. It is often only carelessness of opinion, and sometimes an indirect boast.” -- While I neither love nor hate Fanny I can admire her strength of character that is so unchanging and consistent in both heart and spirit that she will always be much as she ever was. I only argue that a desire to see her and Henry together can be less about the want of a torrid romance and more about seeing tempests calmed. Henry and even in part Mary appeal to the part of us that brings both shame and pride. Ego and selfishness when tempered with humility and selfless devotion would seem to create such perfect harmony as to be tempting to any reader. In allegorical form wouldn't the literal marriage of two such concepts appeal? Although I have already called Fanny unchanging and admired her for it part of me would see her and Henry combine to lose the image of saint and sinner and see only the human remain.
ReplyDelete“Nothing is more deceitful," said Darcy, "than the appearance of humility. It is often only carelessness of opinion, and sometimes an indirect boast.” -- While I neither love nor hate Fanny I can admire her strength of character that is so unchanging and consistent in both heart and spirit that she will always be much as she ever was. I only argue that a desire to see her and Henry together can be less about the want of a torrid romance and more about seeing tempests calmed. Henry and even in part Mary appeal to the part of us that brings both shame and pride. Ego and selfishness when tempered with humility and selfless devotion would seem to create such perfect harmony as to be tempting to any reader. In allegorical form wouldn't the literal marriage of two such concepts appeal? Although I have already called Fanny unchanging and admired her for it part of me would see her and Henry combine to lose the image of saint and sinner and see only the human remain.
ReplyDeleteI disliked Fanny because as a young girl I was like her. However, I think her portrayal is unrealistic. She is depressed, lonely, constantly repressing any real happiness, joy, freedom, or confidence in favor of humble obedience, out of fear and low self-confidence. Yet she is often a little fake (pretending to be a close friend of Mary Crawford who she dislikes) rather than causing a stir by saying what she really thinks, preferring to silently judge (as with Lovers' Vows). Her morality is also questionable and doesn't make sense: she is horrified by the play because acting is immoral (?) and Sir Thomas would disapprove, but feels comfortable doing what Sir Thomas disapproves in refusing to marry Henry. Where do her sense of morals spring from? It is clearly not concern for others' happiness as she often is happiest when those around her are miserable and vice versa. It doesn't come from blind obedience either. It is based on a judgmental sense of propriety: she is horrified by dirt and noise in her parents' house too, when a bit of disorder and little boys running around playing loudly often seems far more joyous than the silent and repressed life she leads in Mansfield park. She acts like the dirtiness, happiness and disorder is as much a sin as the play. I find it impossible to believe that she is happy or in any way the moral paragon Austen portrays her as. She is not. so good or so moral as Henry Crawford thinks, but simply so quiet that her flaws are not evident to onlookers.
ReplyDelete